Showing posts with label scott_mcleod. Show all posts
Showing posts with label scott_mcleod. Show all posts

Monday, September 14, 2009

Did You Know? 4.0: The Economist Media Convergence Remix

The Economist Magazine is hosting their third annual Media Convergence Forum in New York City on October 20th and 21st. Earlier this year they asked if they could remix Did You Know?/Shift Happens with a media convergence theme and use it for their conference. Scott McLeod and I said sure, they got XPLANE to create the presentation, and the result is farther down in this post. Unfortunately, I won�t be able to attend the Forum, as I�m already missing school a few days this fall and I just couldn�t justify missing a couple more (it was very kind of The Economist to invite Scott and me), but it looks like an interesting event.

A few anticipatory FAQ's about this version.
  1. It�s the first one that I�ve been part of that does not have a specific education focus (although I certainly think the media convergence ideas discussed in the video have great relevance for education). The idea behind the original (and subsequent) presentations was to start/continue/advance the conversation around certain ideas, so I see this hopefully doing the same thing around media convergence (and, selfishly, it will hopefully get some of the folks attending The Economist�s Media Convergence Forum to perhaps focus on some of the education ideas in the previous DYK�s). And, given the Creative Commons license on the previous versions, folks are not limited to remixes that only talk about education.

  2. They decided to designate it version 4.0 even though there have been only two previous �official� versions. But the Sony/BMG remix that is currently the hot version is typically referred to as version 3.0, so who are we to argue with the wisdom of the crowd?

  3. I should not get much, if any, credit for this one. I sent along a fair amount of statistics for their consideration, and certainly provided some feedback along the way, but otherwise didn�t have nearly as much to do with this version. Laura Bestler, Scott McLeod�s graduate assistant, did most of the research for this one, and of course XPLANE did all the graphical work. (I should, however, still get most or all of the blame if you don�t like it, since I started this whole mess.)

  4. Like the previous versions, this one is released under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 license, so you�re welcome to use/modify as you see fit, as long as you follow the terms of that license.
Finally, an observation. In a recent email Scott McLeod wrote, �It�s amazing, the legs this thing still has.� I would have to agree. The various versions have been viewed well over 20 millions times (my guess is that with downloaded versions and audience showings it�s probably closer to 30 million times, but 20 million would be the safe number). It�s been shown to audiences large and small, educational and corporate and everything in between. It's been shown to the leaders of our national defense and to incoming congressmen. It�s been shown by university presidents and kindergarten teachers, televangelists and politicians, folks just trying to make a buck and those trying to save the world. And this week it even made an appearance in Nancy Gibb�s essay in Time Magazine.

What does it all mean? (Well, besides the self-referential and now self-serving answer of �Shift Happens.�) I think the fact that a simple little PowerPoint (some folks would say simplistic and they would be right � it was meant to be the start of a conversation, not the entire conversation) can be viewed by so many folks and start so many conversations means that we live in a fundamentally different world than the one I (and most of you reading this) grew up in.

I know some folks would dispute that, and that�s an interesting conversation in and of itself, but if you buy that � if you buy that on so many levels the world is a fundamentally different place � then it just begs us to ask the question of whether schools have similarly transformed from when we grew up. If your answer to that question is no, as I think it probably is for a large majority of you, and if you see a problem with that, then what should we do? What is my responsibility, and your responsibility, for making the changes we believe are necessary? What are you willing to step up and do?

Here�s the presentation. Source files will be uploaded to the wiki shortly.

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

We Can Do This. We Should Do It.

I'm way behind in my "personal professional development through RSS" (i.e., I have a lot of unread items in Google Reader), but luckily I took the time to read this post by Scott McLeod. Scott embeds two presentations given by Dr. Richard Miller, the Chair of the English Department at Rutgers University.

I'm also going to embed the two presentations below (the second one is in two parts), and I think it's well worth your time to watch both of them, particularly if you teach Language Arts, but really if you care about education at all. After each presentation I've pulled a few select quotes that really resonated with me.

The Future is Now: Presentation to the RU Board of Governors



We're living in the time of the most significant change in human expression in human history.
Do you agree? If so, what implications does that have for the way we teach Language Arts? What about other subject areas?
This is the room we're particularly proud of - the Collaboratory.
OK, when I build my school, I'm so going to have a Collaboratory. Actually, every room will be one. Perhaps that should be the name of the school?
To compose, and compose successfully in the 21st century, you have to not only excel at verbal expression, at written expression, you have to also excel in the use and manipulation of images. That's what it means to compose.
Shades of "The Yancey." Note that this is additive - no one is suggesting that words don't matter, that what we traditionally think of as "writing" is no longer important, but that the very nature of composition is more complex now, and that our instruction, our pedagogy, our learning spaces need to reflect that.
This is all building towards a larger vision of the humanities for the 21st century.
. . . In the New Humanities what we imagine at the center is this collective, collaborative kind of composition.
Social construction. Social composition.
The real function of the humanities is to engage in the art of creativity - moment by moment - to improve the quality of the world we live in.
I'm certainly not a linguist, but doesn't that get back to the root of "humanities?" And have perhaps some of our academic treatments of the humanities forgotten the human part that should be the center of our work?
That's writing in the 21st century. It's multiply authored, it's multiply produced, and that's where English is going.
Is that where English is going in your school?





This Is How We Dream (Part 1 and Part 2)





It has never been a more important moment for this profession, or for people who take reading and writing seriously.
Do you agree? If so, what implications does that have for your school? Your classroom?
I spent my time understanding writing as a solitary activity . . . I'm a person of the book.
Writing (composing) is no longer exclusively a solitary activity. And we need to expand our definition of composition beyond only text and beyond only a specific medium (book, research paper, academic journal).
An assignment for a class I taught for first year students called Creativity and Collaboration.
This is a class I'll be offering in my new school (The Collaboratory).
Ideas don't belong to us individually, but they belong to us as a culture. And that we as educators must be in the business of sharing ideas freely.
Shades of Pesce.
The limits and restrictions are largely ones we put on ourselves.
No excuses.
This is a way to push ideas into our culture. Why wouldn't we be at the front edge of that?
Yes, why wouldn't we?
We do not have a pedagogy on hand to teach the kind of writing I'm describing. It needs to be invented.
Alan Kay said the best way to predict the future is to invent it. The best way to figure out what composition should look like in the 21st century is to co-create it.
We can do this. We should do it.
We should get started.

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Did You Know? - Music Industry Remix

A while back Scott McLeod, Jeff Brenman (who did the Slideshare version) and I received an email from someone at Sony BMG Music Entertainment asking us if they could remix the various versions of Did You Know? for a meeting they had coming up. We said sure and they came up with this and gave us permission to link to it. (It takes a little while to load - sorry, can't figure out how to embed it. you'll have to follow the link).

Here's the written description:
The following adaptation of the original "Shift Happens" presentation was created by Sony BMG Music Entertainment. The video, presented by Richard Sanders, President of Sony BMG International, was shown on 4 May 2008 to 150 of the company's top executives gathered in Rome for Sony BMG�s annual Global Management Meeting. As part of Sony BMG�s mission to improve the music experience for consumers living in "exponential times", the video illustrates the demand for change.
No words of wisdom here, I just thought some of you might find it interesting.

Update: That link no longer works, but you can find it on YouTube, or download a high quality version (mp4, 41.9 MB). As with all remixes of Did You Know?/Shift Happens, it's Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike licensed, so you're welcome to use it under that license.

Monday, November 26, 2007

It�s an Honor Just to be Nominated (again)

Update 12-9-07: I'd like to thank the Academy . . .


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2007 Edublogs Award nominations were announced over the weekend. They have expanded to 14 categories this year � I encourage you to check them out � there are again quite a few blogs that I haven�t looked at before. Vote early, vote often.




Yes, this blog was nominated again this year, this time for Most Influential Blog Post (for Is It Okay To Be A Technologically Illiterate Teacher? � I did not see that one coming). Much like last year�s nomination, I feel honored to be in such good company. Also much like last year�s nomination, I think I might rank my post as #5 out of 5 in the category (but at least it�s in the top five!).

Don�t get me wrong, I think we�re doing good stuff around here and the conversations around that post were helpful as we explore how best to meet the needs of our students. But the other four posts in this category are stellar � I encourage you to read them:

Now, I will admit that it�s nice to see that three of those posts have a Colorado connection (mine, Scott�s and Ben�s) � apparently we have an outsized influence on the world (well, at least the edublog world). That fits in nicely with this year�s New Year�s resolution.

Thanks to all of you who nominated the post, whoever you are. Don�t forget to vote (and more importantly, check out all the thought-provoking blogs)!

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

20 To Watch

Well, since Scott outed me, I suppose I should link to the NSBA�s �20 to Watch.�

This is certainly a nice honor, but like the article in the paper the other day, it feels a little strange. Since most of what I do is simply write about what other folks are doing, either in my building or elsewhere, I�m not sure I�m real comfortable being the one singled out. So, if you�re a teacher in my school, or if you�re someone who I�ve written about previously, consider yourself �one of many to watch.�

And congrats to the other folks on the list, especially Scott and Gary Stager, the two other folks that I "know."

Update 10-24-07: NSBA has added podcasts for a few folks. They interviewed us over the phone and then edited them way down. Here's mine (or direct mp3 file 3 minutes, 2.75 MB) - not as bad as I feared.

Friday, June 22, 2007

Did You Know? 2.0

I blogged previously that XPLANE had offered to make the original Did You Know/Shift Happens presentation more visually appealing. Well, it�s now finished, and you can view it below. For me, this really isn�t a "sequel" to Did You Know, it�s just different. Some folks will prefer the original, some will prefer this version, some will dislike both. For me, it�s just another attempt to create a conversation, so I hope that it does.

XPLANE�s goal was to make it more visually appealing than text on a PowerPoint background, thinking that by adding some graphics and animation that it could convey the message to more folks (particularly folks whose first language is not English).

I (and Scott) had two main goals. First, I wanted to make it less us (as in U.S.) versus them. That wasn�t my intent in the original, but it certainly could be interpreted that way. It still includes some of the U.S./China/India statistics, because we felt those were indicative of the "shifts" that are occurring, but it avoids words like "we" and "they." But we want all kids to be successful, whether they are in the U.S., India, China or somewhere else. We believe these ideas and conversations should be occurring globally, and we hope this helps contribute to that conversation.

Second, one of the (many) weaknesses of the original is that it didn�t ask anything of the viewers, or direct them to any resources. (In my own defense, that�s because it was just for my staff and I was doing the follow-up. As I�ve talked about previously, I had no idea that it would spread like it did . . .). This new version asks some questions at the end and directs folks to a wiki with some additional information (the wiki is still a work in progress, but we'll get there eventually). The wiki is not intended as a "one-stop" resource, just a fairly simple jumping off point for folks that would like more information. Hopefully they will be drawn into the conversations that we all have been a part of over the last few years. (I wanted to ask even more questions � I may blog those eventually � but it would�ve made the presentation way too long � at over 8 minutes, it�s already pushing it).

If you find it useful, please use it however you�d like (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike license). The YouTube version is embedded below, there's a Google Video version, and you can download a high-quality version in several different formats (just enter your name at the prompt) as well.



Thank you to XPLANE for some truly excellent visuals and animations, and to Scott McLeod for all his work and support. Frankly, I�m a little tired of the presentation, but I still passionately believe that we need to reexamine formal education as it�s currently being experienced by our students and that we owe it to our children to do everything we can to improve. If the presentation draws even a few folks into asking questions and getting involved in the conversations either locally or globally, then I�ll consider it a success.